Platinum Rule Assessment

Behavior happens to be a very vital component in an individuals life in as far as good image of ones personality is concerned. Though it does not necessary portray the real picture of one as it is dynamic. Different individuals lead differently in different situations. This by and large depends with the set rules and bideations of any particular setting. According to the disc Platinum triumph Behavioral Assessment thither are four basic styles of behaviors Dominance style, Interactive style, Steadiness style and Cautious style. (Alessandra, 2008, p. 28)The biggest challenge is how one can cope with all these different styles with weensy or no difficulty. Everyone is judge to at least formulate his/ her own mechanism that puts him/her in a better position to comfortably accommodate and toy negotiations with all the behavioural style. This ability to amicably relate with masses with different personality according to DPRA has been compared to Intelligence Quotient since it p ositions people to stand high find of interacting swimmingly and as a consequence they add up a taste in their lives. (Alessandra, 2008, p. 6)The neighborly scientists have renamed this ability as social Intelligence from adaptability since allone strives to see to it his /her different needs through interaction. They have argued out that social Intelligence has gained a great deal of importance to an extent that it is at times considered to a great extent essential than the natural Intelligence Quotient. This is because social intelligent people have that tendency to draw a line between their personality and their behaviors with reference to their actions later on world triggered by different situations. (Alessandra, 2008, p. 6)In a host of individuals these different behavior styles are portrayed. Like for instance in this youth group that was formed to denigrate abject poverty among the youth, most of the members had Dominance and Steadiness styles of behavior. The ones with the Dominance behavioral style had uncontrollable zeal to be the key office bearers and by chance almost all of them were the ones who occupied the key positions within the group and beside that they were the ones who speeded up the decision making processes following their desires to achieve great things within short periods.On the other(a) afford, those with Steadiness style of behavior were so fond of working with several rest periods incorporated in between, enjoyed delegating and making follow ups on groups activities. Much of the long term planning was being handled by them. (Alessandra, 2008, p. 5) The ones with the dominance behavioral style were risk takers and they took great pleasure to experiment raw(a) things and being the ones in charge of every groups activity.They seemed to be fascinated by the fact that they were hard working especially after realizing that they were being driven by their strong desire to achieve greater things without impediments on the wa y. The ones with the Steadiness style of behavior were quite proactive and they enjoyed working in communal with full foresight that the entire group will benefit from their efforts. (Alessandra, 2008, p. 6) The dominance behavioral stylists were very impatient when things went at a slow pace. They were naturally fast-paced and enjoyed doing things in great speed.Their counterparts, the Steadiness stylists, took things slowly and with great care. The dominance behavioral stylists were product-oriented and innovators. They loved seeing their efforts give rise to fruits as quick as they exerted and without winning precautions, they enjoyed trying new ideas. The Steadiness behavioral stylists on the other hand, were slow but sure. They were not that much concerned close the quick feedbacks in term of result since they were quite patient and usually took the back seat and gave a keen look as things rolled out. (Alessandra, 2008, p. 31)The dominance behavioral stylists were quite se lfish in that they concentrated all their efforts on a particular activity with the ultimate connotation of satisfying their ego. The Steadiness behavioral stylists worked extra hard and represent great pleasure in things that worked best for the good of all. The dominance behavioral stylists had a dont care attitude. They did things deliberately and with less concern intimately other peoples feelings. They were willing to provoke and make others mad with the mentality that their offended will without hesitation find it easy to forgive them.They believed in apologizing rather than seeking for permission to do things. (Alessandra, 2008, p. 14) The dominance behavioral stylists believed in being good at multitasking thus they went for several activities with a greedy anticipation that they would all be achieved within a stipulated duration. The Steadiness behavioral stylists enjoyed doing their things one after the other at ago. They seemed not to worry so much about time so long a s what they intended to do came to be realized or implemented finally. (Alessandra, 2008, p. 15)The dominance behavior stylists were quite bold and took up new challenges with full authority and tackled problems as they emerged. The Steadiness stylists were a bit reluctant when faced by challenges following their strong belief in aggroup work. For matters to be solved in short time, the entire group had to be assigned the duty to deliberate over it and come up with a substantial solution. The dominance behavioral stylists were never contented by the status quo opportunities. They liked dramatic changes and new exposures. consequently they were adventurous.The Steadiness behavioral stylists on the other hand had no problem with the status quo though at times they raised their eye brows when they felt the status quo tended to be an impediment for the groups harvest-feast and development. (Alessandra, 2008, p. 14) The dominance behavior stylists and the Steadiness behavior stylists were both goal oriented. They were both driven by the innate force to have things done with an overall intension of improving the situation of the group. Both the dominance behavioral stylists and the steadiness behavioral stylists took up responsibilities differently.Thus the combination of their efforts and fortitude made the group achieve greater and greater set goals since everyones contributions counted. The tasks handled by both stylists formed a strong basis upon which goals and aspirations concerning the growth of the group were realized. . (Alessandra, 2008, p. 5) Both the dominance behavioral stylists and the steadiness behavioral stylists were quite optimistic in that they constant quantityly indulged themselves in activities with a broader picture of bringing considerable benefit for the group.Both the dominance behavioral stylists and the steadiness behavioral stylists were unresolved to challenges and acted upon them differently. They were positive on taking up chall enges thus they were not easily brought down or distorted from what they were doing for the group. Both the dominance behavioral stylists and the steadiness behavioral stylists took up active roles in conducting the groups activities. Every one had certain expectations when it came about performing their duties for the group and with that the work load was shared every bit among the members.Both the dominance behavioral stylists and the steadiness stylists planned before they took action though the time frames differed. . (Alessandra, 2008, p. 14) The benefit of having these two behavioral styles being predominant in the youth group was that most of the members were exposed to learn the skills of coping comfortably with the different personalities. This was especially during the conduct of tasks where after being assigned different duties different members were expected to deliver their best for the betterment of the good.Therefore, through cooperation among and within the members all came to be realized. (Alessandra, 2008, p. 34) Having the two behavioral styles in the group enabled every member to have an national cognition and appreciation of the nature and ability in terms of performance that different individuals had without underrating and despising one another. The group members came into terms with the fact that constant earlier experienced groups dynamics were problematic and mostly were the cause of underperformance that the group experienced.The problem was discovered to be promoted by the misinterpretation that ab initio most of the members had over others, and thus the idea of keenly understanding one another much deeper helped a lot to minimize the wrangles. (Alessandra, 2008, p. 6) The skills of multitasking by the dominance behavioral stylists was disseminated to the Steadiness behavioral stylists and others thus the group faced little difficulties in terms of implementing activities that require bigger man power. The members could take up t asks that initially they opinion were meant to be for the best of the best individuals.Leadership positions kept on rotating from one individual to another since everyone was deemed a potential leader. With this the group kept on doing quite well as new and new ideas on how to better the group were brought forward by the different leaders. Encouragement and motivational comments were also given out to every member so as to boost their self esteem. The fact that these two behavioral styles happened to be predominant in the group gave a room for social learning where at least every was made to discover his/ her strength and weaknesses in as far as good behavior is concerned.(Alessandra, 2008, p. 6) CONCLUSION The Disc Platinum Rule of Behavioral Style is a form of gauging tool that tries to give a clear picture of the personality composition that different individuals have. The major(ip) behavioral styles that have been highlightened above show the differences associated with differe nt personalities. Every individual is therefore expected to force him/her self to accommodate and relate comfortably with people who happen to have different behavioral style.The best way recommended by DPRA for proper interaction is for individuals to treat others fairly well the same way they expect others to treat them. With this tension will be minimized and as a result unity and harmony will prevail among a group of people, in like manner the rapport among them being strong. The different behavioral styles to some extent form a strong basis upon which individuals can be categorized with reference to their temperaments. The behavioral styles make a clear resemblance of the different temperaments though in an indirect version.The behavioral styles by and large march with the four major temperaments. Thus it is worth noting that there is a strong connection between an individuals behavior and his/her temperament despite the slight differences that might be noticed. honorable men tion Alessandra, T. , (2008) Platinum Rule Behavioral Style Assessment. Custom edition from The University of Phoenix. Available at http//UOP. BlanchardAssessments. com Accessed on July 17, 2008. Alessandra, T. & OConnor, M, J. (1996) The Platinum Rule Discover the Four BasicBusiness Personalities. -And How They dejection Lead You to Success. Available at www. amazon. com/ The Platinum Rule Discover the Four Basic Business Personalities. Accessed on July 17, 2008. Alessandra, T. , OConnor, M, J. & Dyke, J, V. People Smarts Bending the Golden Rule to Give Others What They Want. Available at www. amazon. com/People-Smarts-Bending-Golden-Others. . Accessed on July 17, 2008. Bonnstetter, J. & Suiter, R. (2001). The Universal Language DISC, Skills Training Manual for Treating behaviour.. Available at www. dropbears.com/b/broughsbooks/health/psychology_personality. htm . Accessed on July 17, 2008. Ritchey, T. & Koehler, B. (1998) Im Stuck, Youre Stuck. The Power of 360 Feedback. Gulf Pu blishers. Straw, J. & Koehler, B, (2002) The 4-Dimensional Manager. Disc strategies for managing Different people in the best ways. Available at www. amazon. com/Dimensional-Manager-Strategies-Managing-Different. Accessed on July 17, 2008 Hersey, P. , Blanchard, K, H,(1993),Management of Organizational Behavior, A guide to utilizing charitable resource. Prentice Hall.